Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley appears by her choice to reject a ballot proposal to repeal the state’s 2011 casino legislation. (Image: AP Photo/Elise Amendola)
Opponents of casino gambling in Massachusetts have actually been war that is waging the expansion on every battlefront possible. They’ve had wins and losses across the continuing state, however they’ve always made their case. Now, they’re hoping that the highest court in Massachusetts can give them one last possiblity to put the issue before voters.
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court heard arguments a week ago over the question of whether a measure to repeal the 2011 casino law can appear on the statewide ballot in November. The move would really produce a referendum on whether gambling enterprises could be built one which could disrupt the process also if it absolutely was to ultimately fail.
State Believes Implied Contracts Would Be Violated By Repeal
That disruption had been one for the main arguments made by lawyers for their state, including Attorney General Martha Coakley, whom rejected the petition it was unconstitutional because she felt. According to Coakley, such a repeal would cause damage to the ‘implied contracts’ between casino license applicants and the continuing state gambling commission. She argued that those contract rights would be illegally recinded without any settlement for the casino companies.
Coakley made remarks Continue reading article